The Top 7 Shocking Cheating In The Olympics Scandals

Posted: January 12, 2024

Updated: January 12, 2024

Cheating in the Olympics undermines the spirit of fair competition, erodes the integrity of the games, and betrays the trust of athletes and spectators who look to the event as a symbol of sportsmanship and excellence. Such dishonest practices tarnish the achievements of true athletes and compromise the principles that the Olympics aim to uphold.

Cheating in the Olympics can stem from various reasons, including the intense pressure to succeed, the desire for fame or recognition, financial incentives, national pride, or even individual athletes' pursuit of personal glory. Some athletes may succumb to the temptation to cheat due to the immense expectations placed upon them by their country or supporters. The pursuit of victory and the drive to achieve can lead some individuals to resort to unfair means, such as doping or breaking regulations, in hopes of gaining a competitive edge. Additionally, the Olympics represent a platform where success can translate to lucrative sponsorship deals, endorsements, and fame. For some athletes, these potential rewards might overshadow the principles of fair play and encourage them to cheat in pursuit of these external rewards. Pressure from coaches, federations, or governing bodies to win medals for national pride can also contribute to cheating behaviour. In some cases, systemic issues within a country's sports infrastructure may lead to an environment where cheating is tacitly accepted or even encouraged. When you consider just how much money is wagered on Olympic sports, the pressure to succeed can become almost unbearable. Many of these sportsmen have sacrificed everything in an effort to reach the top, so finding a tiny underhand advantage must be tempting. When it comes to sports betting at the Olympics or any other sports, we find that Bet365 Sportsbook is the number one sportsbook site in the US offering the best selection of betting markets and odds.

Ben Johnson, Seoul, 1988

There were drug cheats before, and there have been drug cheats since. But according to online gambling news in the US, it took the downfall of Ben Johnson to demonstrate the apparent ubiquity of banned substances at the very highest level of sport. On the evening of 24 September, the Canadian sprinter set a new world record of 9.79 seconds in the men's 100m final, lifting his hand in triumph as he crossed the finish line ahead of arch rival Carl Lewis and Britain's Linford Christie, in what a BBC commentator declared "the greatest sprint race in history". Three days later, it became the most tarnished. Johnson was stripped of his medal, and had his record expunged after a sample of his urine tested positive for stanozolol, an illegal steroid.

He initially denied cheating in the Olympics, but later confessed – arguing that drug use was endemic in top-tier athletics. In a way, he had a point: six of the eight finalists in that famous 100m race were at some point in their careers tainted by association with "juicing", and several, like him, served bans. But no one fell further, or harder, or more publicly than Ben Johnson. And somehow, the Olympic ideal would never feel quite the same.

Cheating In The Olympics - Boris Onischenko, Montreal, 1976

At the height of the Cold War, when Olympic sports were a cipher for political clashes between East and West, the heavily-favoured Russians took on second-favourites, Great Britain, in the fencing leg of the Modern Pentathlon. Onischenko, who had won silver in the previous two Games, and was desperate to go one better, easily dispatched the UK's Danny Parker. Then he won a baffling bout against Adrian Parker, in which the electronic scoreboard registered a hit, despite an apparent lack of contact between Onischenko's épée and Parker's body. Next up was Jim Fox, a British Army captain. Early in their bout, the scoreboard once more lit up, suggesting a Soviet triumph. But Fox, who was sure he'd taken evasive action, was having none of it – and demanded an examination of his opponent's sword. "I thought the weapon was faulty," he later recalled. That was only the half of it. Buried beneath the leather handle, judges discovered an intricate wiring system designed to register a "hit" when a small button was pressed. "It was a real engineering job," said Mike Proudfoot, the British team manager. "Not just a ham amateur's effort. They had to dismantle the weapon to discover it." The Russian was disqualified, sent home in disgrace, and dubbed 'Dishonischenko' by the British tabloids. Fox and his colleagues eventually won gold, registering a victory for fair play, in the face of perhaps the most audacious piece of cheating in the Olympics ever recorded.

Fred Lorz, St Louis, 1904

The 1904 men's marathon took place on a sweltering day, over a hilly dirt course made all the more gruelling by huge clouds of dust thrown up by the vehicles accompanying the runners. Lorz, a New York bricklayer, triumphantly crossed the finish line in three hours and 13 minutes, roughly a quarter of an hour ahead of his nearest rival. He'd already been photographed with Alice Roosevelt, the President's daughter, and was preparing for the medal ceremony, when a spectator cried foul. It soon emerged that Lorz had actually withdrawn from the race after just nine miles, before being picked up by his trainer and driven a further 11 miles. When their car broke down, he continued on foot back to the stadium – where the crowd greeted him as the winner. He decided to go along with it, he later claimed, as a "practical joke". The gold medal eventually went to Thomas Hicks, another US athlete. But his victory was also tarnished: during the race trainers had twice given him a "tonic" of strychnine mixed with brandy, to counteract the effects of the hostile conditions. Since performance-enhancing drugs were not illegal at the time, Hicks was allowed to keep the medal. But among purists, he is still regarded as the first Olympic drug cheat.

Ewa Klobukowska, Tokyo, 1964

After decades of nudges, winks, and unflattering rumours about Eastern Bloc shot-putters and their mysterious Adam's apples, the IAAF decided in 1967 to finally introduce gender testing for female athletes. First to fall foul of the new regime was Klobukowska, a Polish sprinter who had taken bronze in the 100m final three years earlier, and was part of the country's gold-medal-winning 4x100m relay team. Tather than directly accuse her of cheating in the Olympics, in a diplomatically-phrased statement, the IAAF declared that she'd been stripped of her titles after being found with "one chromosome too many". Despite her masculine appearance, Klobukowska, who was born in Warsaw in 1946 (and had been raised a girl) was soon vindicated: in 1968, she became pregnant and successfully bore a son. It seems likely that she suffered a genetic abnormality, and was perhaps therefore dealt an injustice by the testing regime of the day. The Olympian spirit might have been better served had the authorities been more pro-active against gender cheats a generation earlier. In 1936, Hitler's Germany cheered on Dora Ratjen, a deep-voiced, broad-shouldered high jumper who refused to share the showers with other female athletes. In later life, it was reported that 'she' had adopted a more appropriate first name: Herman.

Hans-Gunnar Liljenwall, Mexico City, 1968

Competitive pistol shooting requires a steady hand, and nerves of steel. Swedish Modern Pentathlete, Hans-Gunnar Liljenwall, found this relatively easy to achieve: shortly before stepping up to the oche, he steadied his nerves with a strong drink. Alas, newly-introduced anti-doping laws meant that Mexico was the first Games at which athletes were tested for performance-enhancing substances. After being found with "excessive quantities" of alcohol in his system, Liljenwall confessed to competing under the influence of "two beers" and had to return his bronze medal. The affair gave the Swede the dubious honour of being the first-ever Olympian to be disqualified from a Games for drug abuse. After a lengthy inquiry, it also saw his teammates forced to return their gongs. In hindsight, it's hard to view this as deliberately cheating in the Olympics. As such, they were perhaps hard-done-by. After all, as many as 14 of Liljenwall's rivals are rumoured to have tested positive for tranquilisers during the pistol-shooting in Mexico. But they went unpunished, because tranquilisers were at the time not on the official list of banned substances.

Cheating In The Olympics - Park Si-Hun, Seoul, 1988

No one can watch a recording of the famous light-middleweight boxing final between Korea's local hero, Park Si-Hun and a certain Roy Jones Jr, of the USA, without realising that it ended with the wrong man winning. In three accomplished rounds, Jones does all but knock out his opponent, landing 86 punches, among them some ferocious left hooks, to Park's 32, and forcing the referee to administer two standing eight-counts. The Korean was twice warned that he faced disqualification if he failed to properly defend himself. When the final bell went, the crowd waited expectantly for Jones to be crowned Olympic champion. Then, the unthinkable: three of the five judges, a Ugandan, a Uruguayan, and a Moroccan, scored the bout in Park's favour. As the referee held the Korean fighter's arm aloft, he turned to Jones. "I can't believe they're doing this," he said. At the medal ceremony, a clearly embarrassed Park held the fist of his opponent aloft, while the crowd booed. Jones graciously said that he "didn't blame '' his opponent for the fight being rigged. Instead, he declared it to be the fault of the judges, who were promptly suspended. Was Park cheating in the Olympics? Probably not. But someone clearly did. A subsequent IOC investigation found that all three of the dodgy officials had been wined and dined by Korean administrators in the run-up to the event. However, despite rumours of bribery and strange betting patterns throughout the Games, it concluded that there was "no evidence of corruption" at the Seoul boxing events.

The Spanish Paralympic Basketball Team, Sydney, 2000

There are few more heart-warming celebrations of the human spirit than a Paralympic Games. Or at least there were, until Spain decided to make a serious play for gold in the blue-riband event of basketball. The side performed remarkably well on their way to the 'intellectual disability' title. Too well, in fact: in the first round, coaches allegedly ordered them to allow opponents more shots at the basket, to help narrow a suspicious 30-point margin that had opened up by half-time. Scandal erupted after the tournament finished, when photos of the victorious side appeared on the front pages. Several were swiftly recognised by friends as able-bodied club basketballers. Some had university degrees. Tests then revealed that only two of the 12 members of the team had an IQ of less than 75, the level required to be classified a Paralympian. In the ensuing cheating in the Olympics fallout, evidence of an organised conspiracy emerged. Desperate to secure sponsorship and lucrative government grants, well-remunerated Spanish administrators had simply cherry-picked a dream squad, from the ranks of their country's most accomplished amateurs. Fernando Martin Vicente, the mastermind of the extraordinary scam resigned, and athletes with alleged 'intellectual disabilities' banned from subsequent games.

Cheating In The Olympics May Always Be With Us

The real problem stems from the fact that performance enhancing drugs will always be one step ahead of those looking for them. So, though we’d all like to be living in an ideal world where sports cheating holds no sway with overall results, we have to accept that human nature will always trump ethics. Nevertheless, it’s still possible to find sports where both individual and team efforts make for a compelling dual of sorts. In these cases, we recommend utilizing Bet365 Sportsbook for all your sports betting needs. Not only are they fully licensed, but they also cover literally thousands of different betting markets, along with offering some of the best odds for any online sites in the US.